AI Creations in Copyright Court Limbo

The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld a ruling that AI-generated works without human input are not eligible for copyright, rejecting Stephen Thaler's claim for his 'Creativity Machine.'
AI Creations in Copyright Court Limbo

πŸ“š The US Court of Appeals rules AI-created content can't be copyrighted without human input. What does this mean for AI in creative fields? πŸ€” #AICopyright #CreativeAI


  1. The US Court of Appeals confirmed that AI-generated works cannot be copyrighted if created without human involvement.
  2. Stephen Thaler's case, advocating for AI copyright on behalf of his 'Creativity Machine,' was rejected.
  3. This ruling maintains the status quo on copyright laws regarding AI authorship.

The Register: Do AI robo-authors qualify for copyright? It's still no, says appeals court

All Things Cyber–

Community news and updates coming soon.
Link launched πŸ“‘ Avoid spam wormholes and check the 'Promotions' folder.
This is fine πŸ”₯ Well, that didn't work. Try again, fren.